Automated / scheduled / size-limited exfiltration
Chunked, timed transfers evade thresholds
categoryNetwork and infrastructure attacksseverityHighdetectabilityHighlabnot yet measured
Detection opportunity what to watch for
A benign emulation of this technique’s linchpin behaviour — the command an attacker runs, and where we’ve detonated it in the lab, exactly what the SIEM saw, what caught it, and what it missed.
What the attacker runs
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\lab\detonate.ps1 -Technique T1020 -Tool atomic -RunId <run-id> -Command 'Invoke-AtomicTest T1020 -TestGuids 5b380e96-b0ef-4072-8a8e-f194cb9eb9ac -TimeoutSeconds 120'powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\lab\detonate.ps1 -Technique T1030 -Tool atomic -RunId <run-id> -Command 'Invoke-AtomicTest T1030 -TestGuids f0287b58-f4bc-40f6-87eb-692e126e7f8f -TimeoutSeconds 120'Queued for lab measurement — not yet detonated.
Classification
27 values: 13 reviewed, 13 imported, 1 derived. What do these mean?
Exploitability
| Attack vector | Network attacks |
|---|---|
| Reach (CVSS) | Network |
| Attack complexity | Low |
| Privileges required | Low |
| User interaction | None |
| Attacker skill required | Medium |
| Resources required | Low |
| Likelihood / prevalence | High |
| Maturity | Established |
Impact & scope
| Severity | High |
|---|---|
| Impact | Confidentiality |
| Platform | ESXiLinuxmacOSNetwork DevicesWindows |
| Environment | CloudOn-premises |
| Target asset class | Data store |
| Kill-chain phase (tactic) | Exfiltration |
Detection & telemetry
| Detectability | High |
|---|---|
| Testability | Atomic Red Team test |
| Data sources (ATT&CK data components) | Network Connection CreationNetwork Traffic FlowProcess CreationScheduled Job Creation |
Detection & response
Mitigated by 10
- M1031 attack-mitigation
D3-APCAd3fendD3-CSPPd3fendD3-NTCDd3fendD3-NTFd3fendD3-NTSAd3fendD3-PHDURAd3fendD3-PMADd3fendD3-RTSDd3fendD3-UGLPAd3fend
Detected by 15
- DET0213 attack-detection-strategy
- DET0397 attack-detection-strategy
- DET0399 attack-detection-strategy
04ad83ef-1a37-4c10-b57a-81092164bf33sigma0c7686d5-c74e-4292-b224-2a08e956ebc4sigma2dad0cba-c62a-4a4f-949f-5f6ecd619769sigma457cc9ac-d8e6-4d1d-8c0e-251d0f11a74csigma69b3bd1e-b38a-462f-9a23-fbdbf63d2294sigma6c220477-0b5b-4b25-bb90-66183b4089e8sigma7f2bb9d5-6395-4de5-969c-70c11fbe6b12sigma8a63cdd4-6207-414a-85bc-7e032bd3c1a2sigmac3f265c7-ff03-4056-8ab2-d486227b4599sigmac726e007-2cd0-4a55-abfb-79730fbedee5sigmad2e3f2f6-7e09-4bf2-bc5d-90186809e7fbsigmafbc5e92f-3044-4e73-a5c6-1c4359b539desigma
Tested by 4
5b380e96-b0ef-4072-8a8e-f194cb9eb9acatomic9c780d3d-3a14-4278-8ee5-faaeb2ccfbe0atomicab936c51-10f4-46ce-9144-e02137b2016aatomicf0287b58-f4bc-40f6-87eb-692e126e7f8fatomic
Framework references
- Primary source: https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0010/
- attack: T1020 (primary)
- attack: T1029
- attack: T1030
Evidence & sources
- ev-0001 (Cyber Attack Taxonomy) — Name, definition and Example/ID taken verbatim from the 'Network and infrastructure attacks' table, line 211 of Cyber-Attack-Taxonomy.md
- ev-0002 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 18 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)
- ev-0003 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 21 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)
- ev-0004 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 31 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)