Credentials from password stores / vaults
Secrets harvested from Keychain, Credential Manager, password managers, cloud vaults
Detection opportunity what to watch for
A benign emulation of this technique’s linchpin behaviour — the command an attacker runs, and where we’ve detonated it in the lab, exactly what the SIEM saw, what caught it, and what it missed.
What the attacker runs
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\lab\detonate.ps1 -Technique T1555.004 -Tool atomic -RunId run-2026-10-20-012 -Command 'Invoke-AtomicTest T1555.004 -TestGuids 9c2dd36d-5c8b-4b29-8d72-a11b0d5d7439 -TimeoutSeconds 120'What our lab measured
What it looked like in telemetry
| Log source | What it means |
|---|---|
| Sysmon · EID 1 | Suspicious Windows cmd shell execution |
| Sysmon · EID 1 | Windows Credential Manager enumeration: vaultcmd /listcreds (web/vault credential listing) |
| Sysmon · EID 1 | Windows command prompt started by an abnormal process |
| Sysmon · EID 11 | Executable file dropped in folder commonly used by malware |
| PowerShell · EID 4104 | |
| PowerShell · EID 4104 | Powershell script querying system environment variables |
| PowerShell · EID 4104 | Powershell script recursively collected files from a filesystem search |
| PowerShell · EID 4104 | Powershell script searching filesystem |
| … and 6 more event type(s) | |
Detection that fired
- ✓ Wazuh
100402(level 8) lab rule — Windows Credential Manager enumeration: vaultcmd /listcreds (web/vault credential listing)
Plus 13 stock Wazuh/Sysmon rule(s) in the window.
Background noise in the window: ~63843 incidental alerts/hour — tune against this.
Classification
29 values: 13 reviewed, 2 lab-measured, 13 imported, 1 derived. What do these mean?
Exploitability
| Attack vector | Credential attacks |
|---|---|
| Reach (CVSS) | Local |
| Attack complexity | Low |
| Privileges required | Low |
| User interaction | None |
| Attacker skill required | Medium |
| Resources required | Low |
| Likelihood / prevalence | High |
| Maturity | Commoditized |
Impact & scope
| Severity | High |
|---|---|
| Impact | Confidentiality |
| Platform | IaaSLinuxmacOSWindows |
| Environment | CloudOn-premises |
| Target asset class | Identity |
| Kill-chain phase (tactic) | Credential Access |
Detection & telemetry
| Detectability (measured in our lab) | Medium |
|---|---|
| Detectability (public detection content) | High |
| Noise level | High |
| Testability | Atomic Red Team test |
| Data sources (ATT&CK data components) | Cloud Service EnumerationCommand ExecutionFile AccessOS API ExecutionProcess AccessProcess Creation |
Detection & response
Mitigated by 23
- M1017 attack-mitigation
- M1018 attack-mitigation
- M1021 attack-mitigation
- M1026 attack-mitigation
- M1027 attack-mitigation
- M1042 attack-mitigation
- M1051 attack-mitigation
- M1054 attack-mitigation
D3-CFd3fendD3-CMd3fendD3-CQd3fendD3-DFd3fendD3-DId3fendD3-FAd3fendD3-FEd3fendD3-FEVd3fendD3-FIMd3fendD3-LFPd3fendD3-RDd3fendD3-RFd3fendD3-RFAMd3fendD3-SCAd3fendD3-SCFd3fend
Detected by 21
- DET0037 attack-detection-strategy
- DET0057 attack-detection-strategy
- DET0130 attack-detection-strategy
- DET0134 attack-detection-strategy
- DET0396 attack-detection-strategy
- DET0597 attack-detection-strategy
24c77512-782b-448a-8950-eddb0785fc71sigma46612ae6-86be-4802-bc07-39b59feb1309sigma47147b5b-9e17-4d76-b8d2-7bac24c5ce1bsigma4b60e527-ec73-4b47-8cb3-f02ad927ca65sigma58f50261-c53b-4c88-bd12-1d71f12eda4csigma77564cc2-7382-438b-a7f6-395c2ae53b9asigma7a2a22ea-a203-4cd3-9abf-20eb1c5c6cd2sigma851fd622-b675-4d26-b803-14bc7baa517asigmaa1dfd976-4852-41d4-9507-dc6590a3ccd0sigmaa4694263-59a8-4608-a3a0-6f8d3a51664csigmab120b587-a4c2-4b94-875d-99c9807d6955sigmad0dae994-26c6-4d2d-83b5-b3c8b79ae513sigmad557dc06-62e8-4468-a8e8-7984124908cesigmafc028194-969d-4122-8abe-0470d5b8f12fsigma100402wazuh
Tested by 25
124e13e5-d8a1-4378-a6ee-a53cd0c7e369atomic1864fdec-ff86-4452-8c30-f12507582a93atomic1b83cddb-eaa7-45aa-98a5-85fb0a8807eaatomic28498c17-57e4-495a-b0be-cc1e36de408batomic29d0c390-3cbc-4e4e-a52b-a1350ed836b7atomic3d111226-d09a-4911-8715-fe11664f960datomic5c32102a-c508-49d3-978f-288f8a9f6617atomic6f2c5c87-a4d5-4898-9bd1-47a55ecaf1ddatomic70422253-8198-4019-b617-6be401b49fceatomic764ea176-fb71-494c-90ea-72e9d85dce76atomic87e88698-621b-4c45-8a89-4eaebdeaabb1atomic88e1fa00-bf63-4e5b-a3e1-e2ea51c8cca6atomic8c05b133-d438-47ca-a630-19cc464c4622atomic9a2915b3-3954-4cce-8c76-00fbf4dbd014atomic9c2dd36d-5c8b-4b29-8d72-a11b0d5d7439atomica6a5ec26-a2d1-4109-9d35-58b867689329atomicc1402f7b-67ca-43a8-b5f3-3143abedc01batomicdc9cd677-c70f-4df5-bd1c-f114af3c2381atomice359627f-2d90-4320-ba5e-b0f878155bbeatomice544bbcb-c4e0-4bd0-b614-b92131635f59atomice5e3d639-6ea8-4408-9ecd-d5a286268ca0atomiceb8da98a-2e16-4551-b3dd-83de49baa14catomicec1d0b37-f659-4186-869f-31a554891611atomicf543635c-1705-42c3-b180-efd6dc6e7ee7atomicfa714db1-63dd-479e-a58e-7b2b52ca5997atomic
Attack relationships
- Parent: DPAPI secret theft
- Parent: Malware-as-a-service (infostealers)
Lab findings
Measured in the isolated detection lab (Wazuh / Sysmon / auditd). Each run detonates a benign emulation of the technique and grades what the SIEM saw.
| Run | Outcome | Tool | Platform | Ran at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
run-2026-10-20-012 | partially-detected | atomic | windows | 2026-10-20 |
run-2026-11-02-018 | detected | atomic | windows | 2026-11-02 |
run-2026-10-20-012— Backlog detectability-baseline probe (priority 5, 1 corpus attack(s); atomic_tests=2). No lab analytic covers this technique yet, so expected_wazuh_rules is empty and the grade is the true measured detectability: a bundled rule tagged T1555.004 firing is a real 'detected', nothing firing is a real coverage gap for the detection loop. Signals: MITRE documents a detection strategy.; expected=0 incidental=1667 max_level=15 dwell_s=90run-2026-11-02-018— Backlog detectability-baseline probe (priority 5, 1 corpus attack(s); atomic_tests=2). No lab analytic covers this technique yet, so expected_wazuh_rules is empty and the grade is the true measured detectability: a bundled rule tagged T1555.004 firing is a real 'detected', nothing firing is a real coverage gap for the detection loop. Signals: MITRE documents a detection strategy.; expected=1 incidental=30 max_level=15 dwell_s=90
Framework references
- Primary source: https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0006/
- attack: T1555.001 (primary)
- attack: T1555.002
- attack: T1555.003
- attack: T1555.004
- attack: T1555.005
- attack: T1555.006
Evidence & sources
- ev-0001 (Cyber Attack Taxonomy) — Name, definition and Example/ID taken verbatim from the 'Identity, authentication and credential attacks' table, line 338 of Cyber-Attack-Taxonomy.md
- ev-0002 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 1 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)
- ev-0003 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 12 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)
- ev-0004 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 13 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)
- ev-0005 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 14 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)
- ev-0006 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 89 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)
- ev-0007 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 9 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)
- ev-0008 (Phase 4 detection lab - detonation runs 2026-10-20) — Lab detonation run-2026-10-20-012 (partially-detected) for T1555.004: no alert matched the expected technique
- ev-0009 (Phase 4 detection lab - detonation runs 2026-11-02) — Lab detonation run-2026-11-02-018 (detected): Wazuh rule(s) 100402 fired on T1555.004 within the detonation window
Windows Credential Manager enumeration: vaultcmd /listcreds (web/vault credential listing)