Pass-the-hash
Authenticating with a captured NTLM hash instead of the password
Detection opportunity what to watch for
A benign emulation of this technique’s linchpin behaviour — the command an attacker runs, and where we’ve detonated it in the lab, exactly what the SIEM saw, what caught it, and what it missed.
What the attacker runs
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\lab\detonate.ps1 -Technique T1550.002 -Tool atomic -RunId <run-id> -Command 'Invoke-AtomicTest T1550.002 -TestGuids f8757545-b00a-4e4e-8cfb-8cfb961ee713 -TimeoutSeconds 120'powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\lab\detonate.ps1 -Technique T1550.002 -Tool atomic -RunId run-2026-10-11-003 -Command 'Invoke-AtomicTest T1550.002 -TestGuids f8757545-b00a-4e4e-8cfb-8cfb961ee713 -TimeoutSeconds 120'What our lab measured
What it looked like in telemetry
| Log source | What it means |
|---|---|
| Sysmon · EID 11 | Executable file dropped in folder commonly used by malware |
| PowerShell · EID 4104 | Powershell script querying system environment variables |
| PowerShell · EID 4104 | Powershell script recursively collected files from a filesystem search |
| Security · EID 4624 | Non network or service local logon. |
| Security · EID 4634 | Non service account logged off. |
| Security · EID 4672 | Special privileges assigned to new logon. |
Plus 6 stock Wazuh/Sysmon rule(s) in the window.
⚠ Gap: rule 100221, 100240 was expected but did not fire in this run — the telemetry above is the hunt surface, not a solved detection.
Background noise in the window: ~503 incidental alerts/hour — tune against this.
5 public Sigma rule(s) also target this technique.
Classification
24 values: 8 reviewed, 2 lab-measured, 8 imported, 6 derived. What do these mean?
Exploitability
| Attack vector | Credential attacks |
|---|---|
| Reach (CVSS) | Network |
| Attack complexity | Low |
| Privileges required | Low |
| User interaction | None |
| Attacker skill required | Low |
| Resources required | Low |
| Likelihood / prevalence | Medium |
| Maturity | Commoditized |
Impact & scope
| Severity | High |
|---|---|
| Impact | ConfidentialityIntegrity |
| Platform | Windows |
| Environment | On-premises |
| Target asset class | Identity |
| Kill-chain phase (tactic) | Lateral Movement |
Detection & telemetry
| Detectability (measured in our lab) | Low |
|---|---|
| Detectability (public detection content) | High |
| Noise level | High |
| Testability | Atomic Red Team test |
| Data sources (ATT&CK data components) | Active Directory Credential RequestLogon Session CreationNetwork Connection CreationProcess Creation |
| Defense bypassed | System access controls |
Detection & response
Mitigated by 16
- M1018 attack-mitigation
- M1026 attack-mitigation
- M1051 attack-mitigation
- M1052 attack-mitigation
D3-ABPId3fendD3-HBPId3fendD3-HRd3fendD3-HSd3fendD3-KBPId3fendD3-PLAd3fendD3-PSd3fendD3-PSAd3fendD3-PSMDd3fendD3-PTd3fendD3-SCFd3fendD3-WSAMd3fend
Detected by 7
- DET0409 attack-detection-strategy
192a0330-c20b-4356-90b6-7b7049ae0b87sigma24549159-ac1b-479c-8175-d42aea947caesigma8eef149c-bd26-49f2-9e5a-9b00e3af499bsigma98c3bcf1-56f2-49dc-9d8d-c66cf190238bsigmae9d4ab66-a532-4ef7-a502-66a9e4a34f5dsigmaf8d98d6c-7a07-4d74-b064-dd4a3c244528sigma
Tested by 3
eb05b028-16c8-4ad8-adea-6f5b219da9a9atomicec23cef9-27d9-46e4-a68d-6f75f7b86908atomicf8757545-b00a-4e4e-8cfb-8cfb961ee713atomic
Attack relationships
Lab findings
Measured in the isolated detection lab (Wazuh / Sysmon / auditd). Each run detonates a benign emulation of the technique and grades what the SIEM saw.
| Run | Outcome | Tool | Platform | Ran at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
run-2026-10-11-003 | partially-detected | atomic | windows | 2026-10-11 |
run-2026-10-11-003— atomic_tests=3 public_sigma_rules=5 caldera=not-indexed; expected=0 incidental=13 max_level=15 dwell_s=90
Framework references
- Primary source: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1550/
- attack: T1550.002 (primary)
Evidence & sources
- ev-0001 (Cyber Attack Taxonomy) — Name, definition and Example/ID taken verbatim from the 'Identity, authentication and credential attacks' table, line 319 of Cyber-Attack-Taxonomy.md
- ev-0002 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 22 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)
- ev-0003 (Phase 4 detection lab - detonation runs 2026-10-11) — Lab detonation run-2026-10-11-003 (partially-detected) for T1550.002: no alert matched the expected technique