SecureAEye LAB ONLINE · SIG 657 · DET ~41s

← All attacks / Identity, authentication and credential attacks

Password spraying

One or few common passwords tried across many accounts to dodge lockout

categoryIdentity, authentication and credential attacksseverityHighdetectability (measured in our lab)Mediumlabdetected in lab

Example: Midnight Blizzard; >97% of identity attacks (MDDR)

Detection opportunity what to watch for

A benign emulation of this technique’s linchpin behaviour — the command an attacker runs, and where we’ve detonated it in the lab, exactly what the SIEM saw, what caught it, and what it missed.

What the attacker runs

ATT&CK T1110.003 · Atomic Red Team
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\lab\detonate.ps1 -Technique T1110.003 -Tool atomic -RunId run-2026-10-20-007 -Command 'Invoke-AtomicTest T1110.003 -TestGuids f14d956a-5b6e-4a93-847f-0c415142f07d -TimeoutSeconds 120'

What our lab measured

partially detected windows · 2026-10-20 · detected in 0s

What it looked like in telemetry

Log sourceWhat it means
Sysmon · EID 1Access token manipulation: SYSTEM-integrity process created by a non-service parent
Sysmon · EID 1Powershell process spawned powershell instance
Sysmon · EID 11C:\Windows\SysWOW64\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe created a new scripting file under Windows Temp or User data folder
Sysmon · EID 11Executable file dropped in folder commonly used by malware
PowerShell · EID 4104Powershell script querying system environment variables
PowerShell · EID 4104Powershell script recursively collected files from a filesystem search
PowerShell · EID 4104Powershell script searching filesystem
PowerShell · EID 4104Powershell script used "Invoke-command" cmdlet to execute sub script
… and 6 more event type(s)

Detection that fired

  • ✓ Wazuh 100230 (level 10) lab rule — Access token manipulation: SYSTEM-integrity process created by a non-service parent

Plus 20 stock Wazuh/Sysmon rule(s) in the window.

Background noise in the window: ~119255 incidental alerts/hour — tune against this.

Classification

30 values: 9 reviewed, 2 lab-measured, 13 imported, 6 derived. What do these mean?

Exploitability

Attack vectorCredential attacks
Reach (CVSS)Network
Attack complexityLow
Privileges requiredNone
User interactionNone
Attacker skill requiredLow
Resources requiredLow
Likelihood / prevalenceHigh
MaturityCommoditized

Impact & scope

SeverityHigh
ImpactConfidentialityIntegrity
PlatformContainersESXiIaaSIdentity ProviderLinuxmacOSNetwork DevicesOffice SuiteSaaSWindows
EnvironmentCloudOn-premises
Target asset classIdentity
Kill-chain phase (tactic)Credential Access

Detection & telemetry

Detectability (measured in our lab)Medium
Detectability (public detection content)High
Noise levelHigh
TestabilityAtomic Red Team test
Data sources (ATT&CK data components)

Detection & response

Mitigated by 30

  • M1027 attack-mitigation
  • M1032 attack-mitigation
  • M1036 attack-mitigation
  • D3-AEM d3fend
  • D3-ANAA d3fend
  • D3-ANCI d3fend
  • D3-APCA d3fend
  • D3-CAA d3fend
  • D3-CCSA d3fend
  • D3-CDP d3fend
  • D3-CH d3fend
  • D3-CR d3fend
  • D3-CRO d3fend
  • D3-CSPP d3fend
  • D3-CTS d3fend
  • D3-DUC d3fend
  • D3-MFA d3fend
  • D3-NTCD d3fend
  • D3-NTF d3fend
  • D3-NTSA d3fend
  • D3-OPM d3fend
  • D3-OTP d3fend
  • D3-PHDURA d3fend
  • D3-PMAD d3fend
  • D3-PR d3fend
  • D3-PWA d3fend
  • D3-RIC d3fend
  • D3-RTSD d3fend
  • D3-SPP d3fend
  • D3-UGLPA d3fend

Detected by 3

  • DET0487 attack-detection-strategy
  • 100440 wazuh
  • 100441 wazuh

Tested by 9

  • 263ae743-515f-4786-ac7d-41ef3a0d4b2b atomic
  • 5ccf4bbd-7bf6-43fc-83ac-d9e38aff1d82 atomic
  • 90bc2e54-6c84-47a5-9439-0a2a92b4b175 atomic
  • 9c10d16b-20b1-403a-8e67-50ef7117ed4e atomic
  • a8aa2d3e-1c52-4016-bc73-0f8854cfa80a atomic
  • b15bc9a5-a4f3-4879-9304-ea0011ace63a atomic
  • c6f25ec3-6475-47a9-b75d-09ac593c5ecb atomic
  • f14d956a-5b6e-4a93-847f-0c415142f07d atomic
  • f3a10056-0160-4785-8744-d9bd7c12dc39 atomic

Attack relationships

Lab findings

Measured in the isolated detection lab (Wazuh / Sysmon / auditd). Each run detonates a benign emulation of the technique and grades what the SIEM saw.

RunOutcomeToolPlatformRan at
run-2026-10-20-007partially-detectedatomicwindows2026-10-20
run-2026-11-02-017detectedatomicwindows2026-11-02
  • run-2026-10-20-007 — Backlog detectability-baseline probe (priority 5, 1 corpus attack(s); atomic_tests=9). No lab analytic covers this technique yet, so expected_wazuh_rules is empty and the grade is the true measured detectability: a bundled rule tagged T1110.003 firing is a real 'detected', nothing firing is a real coverage gap for the detection loop. Signals: MITRE documents a detection strategy.; expected=0 incidental=3147 max_level=15 dwell_s=90
  • run-2026-11-02-017 — Backlog detectability-baseline probe (priority 5, 1 corpus attack(s); atomic_tests=9). No lab analytic covers this technique yet, so expected_wazuh_rules is empty and the grade is the true measured detectability: a bundled rule tagged T1110.003 firing is a real 'detected', nothing firing is a real coverage gap for the detection loop. Signals: MITRE documents a detection strategy.; expected=2 incidental=59 max_level=15 dwell_s=90

Framework references

Evidence & sources

  • ev-0001 (Cyber Attack Taxonomy) — Name, definition and Example/ID taken verbatim from the 'Identity, authentication and credential attacks' table, line 316 of Cyber-Attack-Taxonomy.md
  • ev-0002 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 17 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)
  • ev-0003 (Phase 4 detection lab - detonation runs 2026-10-20) — Lab detonation run-2026-10-20-007 (partially-detected) for T1110.003: no alert matched the expected technique
  • ev-0004 (Phase 4 detection lab - detonation runs 2026-11-02) — Lab detonation run-2026-11-02-017 (detected): Wazuh rule(s) 100440, 100441 fired on T1110.003 within the detonation window
    PowerShell LDAP bind loop over a credential list (LdapConnection.Bind per password) -- password guessing / spraying -- T1110.001