SecureAEye LAB ONLINE · SIG 657 · DET ~41s

← All attacks / Network and infrastructure attacks

LLMNR / NBT-NS / mDNS poisoning

Answering broadcast name lookups tricks hosts into leaking NTLM hashes

categoryNetwork and infrastructure attacksseverityHighdetectabilityHighlabnot yet measured

Example: Responder

Detection opportunity what to watch for

A benign emulation of this technique’s linchpin behaviour — the command an attacker runs, and where we’ve detonated it in the lab, exactly what the SIEM saw, what caught it, and what it missed.

What the attacker runs

ATT&CK T1557.001 · LLMNR Poisoning with Inveigh (PowerShell) · Atomic Red Team
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\lab\detonate.ps1 -Technique T1557.001 -Tool atomic -RunId <run-id> -Command 'Invoke-AtomicTest T1557.001 -TestGuids deecd55f-afe0-4a62-9fba-4d1ba2deb321 -TimeoutSeconds 120'

Queued for lab measurement — not yet detonated.

Classification

24 values: 13 reviewed, 9 imported, 2 derived. What do these mean?

Exploitability

Attack vectorCredential attacksNetwork attacks
Reach (CVSS)Adjacent
Attack complexityLow
Privileges requiredNone
User interactionNone
Attacker skill requiredLow
Resources requiredLow
Likelihood / prevalenceHigh
MaturityCommoditized

Impact & scope

SeverityHigh
ImpactConfidentiality
PlatformWindows
EnvironmentOn-premises
Target asset classIdentityNetwork device
Kill-chain phase (tactic)CollectionCredential Access

Detection & telemetry

DetectabilityHigh
TestabilityAtomic Red Team test
Data sources (ATT&CK data components)Network Traffic ContentNetwork Traffic FlowService CreationWindows Registry Key Modification

Detection & response

Mitigated by 14

  • M1030 attack-mitigation
  • M1031 attack-mitigation
  • M1037 attack-mitigation
  • M1042 attack-mitigation
  • D3-APCA d3fend
  • D3-CAA d3fend
  • D3-CSPP d3fend
  • D3-NTCD d3fend
  • D3-NTF d3fend
  • D3-NTSA d3fend
  • D3-PHDURA d3fend
  • D3-PMAD d3fend
  • D3-RTSD d3fend
  • D3-UGLPA d3fend

Detected by 11

  • DET0462 attack-detection-strategy
  • 0ed99dda-6a35-11ef-8c99-0242ac120002 sigma
  • 16f5d8ca-44bd-47c8-acbe-6fc95a16c12f sigma
  • 4096842a-8f9f-4d36-92b4-d0b2a62f9b2a sigma
  • 4627c6ae-6899-46e2-aa0c-6ebcb1becd19 sigma
  • 5588576c-5898-4fac-bcdd-7475a60e8f43 sigma
  • 5589ab4f-a767-433c-961d-c91f3f704db1 sigma
  • 679085d5-f427-4484-9f58-1dc30a7c426d sigma
  • bc2e25ed-b92b-4daa-b074-b502bdd1982b sigma
  • cd8c163e-a19b-402e-bdd5-419ff5859f12 sigma
  • e7a21b5f-d8c4-4ae5-b8d9-93c5d3f28e1c sigma

Tested by 1

  • deecd55f-afe0-4a62-9fba-4d1ba2deb321 atomic

Attack relationships

Framework references

Evidence & sources

  • ev-0001 (Cyber Attack Taxonomy) — Name, definition and Example/ID taken verbatim from the 'Network and infrastructure attacks' table, line 195 of Cyber-Attack-Taxonomy.md
  • ev-0002 (MITRE Enterprise ATT&CK v19.2 (STIX 2.1)) — ATT&CK usage prevalence: 7 groups/software/campaigns reference this technique (ATT&CK enterprise v19.2)